Which is the correct way to handle a maintenance discrepancy write-up error?

Which is the correct way to handle a maintenance discrepancy write-up error?

• A. VOID across entire page
• B. Draw line through entry with Captain's initials and employee number
• C. Delete the entry
• D. Either "VOID" or "line through" are correct

Answer: (D)

Maintaining an auditable maintenance record requires marking errors without erasing history. The correct approach is to either VOID the entire entry or draw a line through the erroneous data and include the Captain’s initials and employee number. VOIDing clearly cancels the entry, while a line-through with sign-off preserves the original text for reference, assigns accountability, and shows exactly who identified and approved the correction. Deleting the entry would remove the record and break the trail, which isn’t appropriate for maintenance documentation. Depending on the situation, either method achieves a clear, traceable resolution to a discrepancy write-up error.

Maintaining an auditable maintenance record requires marking errors without erasing history. The correct approach is to either VOID the entire entry or draw a line through the erroneous data and include the Captain’s initials and employee number. VOIDing clearly cancels the entry, while a line-through with sign-off preserves the original text for reference, assigns accountability, and shows exactly who identified and approved the correction. Deleting the entry would remove the record and break the trail, which isn’t appropriate for maintenance documentation. Depending on the situation, either method achieves a clear, traceable resolution to a discrepancy write-up error.