A ________ approach is preferred over a ________ approach.

A ________ approach is preferred over a ________ approach.

• A. Precision-Like / CDA
• B. CDA / Precision-Like
• C. Instrument Landing System / Visual
• D. Visual / Instrument

Answer: (A)

Having a defined vertical guidance and glidepath is essential for a safe, stabilized final approach. A precision-like approach provides vertical guidance and published altitude constraints, similar to an ILS, which helps pilots maintain a steady descent, manage energy, and ensure obstacle clearance. This clarity and control make it preferable over a continuous descent approach, which descends along a constant angle without the same level of published vertical guidance and can increase workload or risk if not managed precisely. When available, use the precision-like approach to optimize stability and safety during the final approach.

Having a defined vertical guidance and glidepath is essential for a safe, stabilized final approach. A precision-like approach provides vertical guidance and published altitude constraints, similar to an ILS, which helps pilots maintain a steady descent, manage energy, and ensure obstacle clearance. This clarity and control make it preferable over a continuous descent approach, which descends along a constant angle without the same level of published vertical guidance and can increase workload or risk if not managed precisely. When available, use the precision-like approach to optimize stability and safety during the final approach.